Multi-Asset

Multi-Asset Strategy Quarterly – April 2023

Iain Cunningham and Michael Spinks outline their cyclical growth view, and suggest that two primary forces remain underappreciated by financial markets; Sahil Mahtani takes a closer look at the semi-conductor industry, vital to modern civilisation, and yet facing a tumultuous period of growth; Russell Silbertson unpacks the latest thinking from leading central banks. Finally, we close with a succinct summary of our higher conviction asset class views, beginning with equities, moving on to fixed income, currency and closing out with commodities.

19 Apr 2023

20 minutes

Multi-Asset team

Chapters

01
Market observations
02
Thematic viewpoint
03
Policy review
04
Summary of high conviction asset class views
05
Equities
06
Fixed Income views
07
Currency views
08
Commodity views
01

Market observations

Close-up view of beautiful curved glass building
Financial markets are being pushed and pulled by headwinds on the one hand and tailwinds on the other – forces that are not fully appreciated by markets. The authors unpack these, and discuss how these influence their investment strategy.

The two forces influencing markets

Iain Cunningham – Co-head of Multi-Asset Growth, Michael Spinks – Co-head of Multi-Asset Growth

We continue to believe that two primary forces remain underappreciated by financial markets. The first being the extent of the coming slowdown in the US and Europe as these economies look set to suffer the consequences of one of the largest and most rapid hiking cycles in many decades. The second is the prospect for recovery in China after the country experienced recessionary conditions last year.

History does not support a soft landing

On the former, financial markets appear to be discounting a high probability of a soft landing in developed economies, supported by expectations that the Federal Reserve will pivot and ease policy later this year to support softer growth. Our outlook remains more cautious for two reasons: One, inflation is likely to remain stickier than expected due to ongoing tightness in the labour market. Wage growth remains inconsistent with inflation returning to central bank targets.

The figure below demonstrates the unusual situation of a significantly higher number of job openings than there are unemployed people available to fill them. The ratio of these datapoints is nearly two to one.

The inflation dynamic reduces the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will be able to pre-emptively ease policy in response to signs of weakening growth.

Will the Fed give the market the easing it wants?

Figure 1: US job openings vs. unemployed people

US job openings vs. Unemployed people

Source: Ninety One, US Bureau of Labour Statistics. March 2023.

And two, soft landings have historically been associated with long and shallow hiking cycles, where economic participants have more time to adjust to higher interest rates. The type of hiking cycle experienced in the US over the past year, from 0-0.25% to 4.75-5.0% for the Federal Fund’s rate, has historically been associated with deeper recessions.

US Economy: soft landing? History implies the odds are low

Figure 2: Historic Fed cycles (% over months)

Historic Fed hiking cycles (% over months)

Source: Ninety One, US Federal Reserve. March 2023.

We believe it is also important to remember that this aggressive rate cycle has taken place after one of the longest periods of easy money in history, where capital will have likely been misallocated, and that policy has notable lags until its effects are felt. We expect the full effects of this hiking cycle to be felt in the second half of this year.

The promise of China’s new up-cycle

On China, financial markets have moved to discount a reopening of the economy over the past six months, but investors remain sceptical about the prospect for a sustained recovery in growth and corporate earnings. We would highlight that China’s credit cycle troughed over a year ago and appears to be entering a new up-cycle, while the regulatory cycle peaked a year ago and new initiatives on this front will likely remain quiet until the economy has shown notable improvement. At the same time, there appears to be material pent-up demand and close to 10% of GDP in excess savings, while policy makers continue to add stimulus. This will be important to offset developed market economic dynamics over the next 12 months which are the primary headwind to assets in Asia, in our view.

A bias towards Chinese equities

As a result of these views our strategies remain underweight equities, with a bias towards the Hong Kong and Chinese markets. In fixed income, we remain overweight defensive duration – focused specifically on high grade markets where low interest rates have encouraged households to build up leverage over the past decade, such as in South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden & Canada. In currency, our strategies maintain a defensive stance and are long reserve currencies (JPY, USD & CHF) vs. the currencies of more economically vulnerable countries (CAD, GBP, SEK, AUD & NZD).

General risks. All investments carry the risk of capital loss. The value of investments, and any income generated from them, can fall as well as rise and will be affected by changes in interest rates, currency fluctuations, general market conditions and other political, social and economic developments, as well as by specific matters relating to the assets in which the investment strategy invests. If any currency differs from the investor’s home currency, returns may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Specific risks. Currency exchange: Changes in the relative values of different currencies may adversely affect the value of investments and any related income. Emerging market (inc. China): These markets carry a higher risk of financial loss than more developed markets as they may have less developed legal, political, economic or other systems. Commodity related investment: Commodity prices can be extremely volatile and significant losses may be made. Default: There is a risk that the issuers of fixed income investments (e.g. bonds) may not be able to meet interest payments nor repay the money they have borrowed. The worse the credit quality of the issuer, the greater the risk of default and therefore investment loss. Equity investment: The value of equities (e.g. shares) and equity-related investments may vary according to company profits and future prospects as well as more general market factors. In the event of a company default (e.g. insolvency), the owners of their equity rank last in terms of any financial payment from that company.

Multi-Asset – latest insights
Multi-Asset team

Important Information

This communication is provided for general information only should not be construed as advice.

All the information in is believed to be reliable but may be inaccurate or incomplete. The views are those of the contributor at the time of publication and do not necessary reflect those of Ninety One.

Any opinions stated are honestly held but are not guaranteed and should not be relied upon.

All rights reserved. Issued by Ninety One.