The bull case for emerging markets just got stronger
As global investors reassess their allocations, emerging markets are entering the second half of the year from a position of genuine strength.
11 May 2026
8 minutes

Global equities rebounded in April, climbing a wall of geopolitical worry to deliver one of their strongest monthly returns since late 2020, despite the US-Iran conflict and its impact on energy markets. Disruption to traffic through the Strait of Hormuz kept oil prices elevated, reinforcing concerns about higher inflation and pushing out expectations for rate cuts from major central banks. Government bonds came under pressure as a result. But risk appetite proved resilient. Rather than extending March’s derisking phase, risk assets responded to a gradual stabilisation in headlines and renewed optimism around corporate earnings and artificial intelligence. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI All Countries World Index (MSCI ACWI), returned 10.2% in USD over the month.
The US led developed markets, as investors returned to AI-linked companies and other growth stocks, while Japanese stocks also recovered. In emerging markets (EM), South Korea and Taiwan were the standout performers globally, both setting all-time highs on the back of the AI semiconductor cycle. Chinese equities also advanced, but continued to lag the broader EM recovery, as significant structural challenges remain in place. Elsewhere, European and UK equities posted positive returns but underperformed the broader global rally.Sector performance reinforced the growth and AI narrative. Information technology was the standout performer, while communication services and industrials also gained strongly, supported by enthusiasm for AI infrastructure, automation and broader capital spending. Consumer discretionary benefitted from the recovery in risk appetite. Performance within energy reflected consolidation following outsized strength in March, while health care was broadly flat and consumer staples, utilities and materials delivered more modest gains.
| Indices (total return in local currency) | |
|---|---|
| S&P 500 | 10.5% |
| Nasdaq Composite | 15.3% |
| MSCI ACWI | 10.2% |
| Nikkei 225 | 16.1% |
| EuroStoxx 600 | 4.8% |
| FTSE 100 | 2.3% |
| Hang Seng Index | 4.1% |
| SSE Composite | 5.7% |
Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April 2026.
Equities rally despite oil shock
Global equities rebounded in April, climbing a wall of geopolitical worry to deliver one of their strongest monthly returns since late 2020, despite the US-Iran conflict and its impact on energy markets. Disruption to traffic through the Strait of Hormuz kept oil prices elevated, reinforcing concerns about higher inflation and pushing out expectations for rate cuts from major central banks. Government bonds came under pressure as a result. But risk appetite proved resilient. Rather than extending March’s derisking phase, risk assets responded to a gradual stabilisation in headlines and renewed optimism around corporate earnings and artificial intelligence. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI All Countries World Index (MSCI ACWI), returned 10.2% in USD over the month.
The US led developed markets, as investors returned to AI-linked companies and other growth stocks, while Japanese stocks also recovered. In emerging markets (EM), South Korea and Taiwan were the standout performers globally, both setting all-time highs on the back of the AI semiconductor cycle. Chinese equities also advanced, but continued to lag the broader EM recovery, as significant structural challenges remain in place. Elsewhere, European and UK equities posted positive returns but underperformed the broader global rally.Sector performance reinforced the growth and AI narrative. Information technology was the standout performer, while communication services and industrials also gained strongly, supported by enthusiasm for AI infrastructure, automation and broader capital spending. Consumer discretionary benefitted from the recovery in risk appetite. Performance within energy reflected consolidation following outsized strength in March, while health care was broadly flat and consumer staples, utilities and materials delivered more modest gains.
| Indices (total return in local currency) | |
|---|---|
| S&P 500 | 10.5% |
| Nasdaq Composite | 15.3% |
| MSCI ACWI | 10.2% |
| Nikkei 225 | 16.1% |
| EuroStoxx 600 | 4.8% |
| FTSE 100 | 2.3% |
| Hang Seng Index | 4.1% |
| SSE Composite | 5.7% |
Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April 2026.
US equities rebound as tech rallies
US equities rebounded in April, as investors looked through geopolitical risk and returned to growth stocks. The US-Iran conflict kept oil prices elevated and complicated the inflation outlook, but it did not prevent a powerful recovery in risk appetite. The technology-heavy Nasdaq rose 15%, while the S&P 500 gained 10.5% over the same period.
Semiconductor and AI-related shares led the rally, helped by strong earnings, renewed confidence in AI spending and improving sentiment towards mega-cap technology companies. The advance was not confined to technology, however: consumer discretionary also gained on the recovery of risk appetite, while industrials benefitted from optimism around AI infrastructure, automation and capital spending.
The macro backdrop remained challenging but did not derail the rally. The Federal Reserve maintained a cautious stance, leaving rates unchanged while signalling that persistent inflation pressure could keep policy tighter for longer. Markets nevertheless drew support from resilient corporate earnings, with first-quarter results generally stronger than expected and investors growing more confident that profit growth could help offset the drag from higher energy costs and tighter-for-longer monetary policy.
A mid-month reprieve
South African equity markets edged higher over the month, with the JSE All Share Index posting a modest gain despite significant volatility driven by the Middle East conflict. The geopolitical shock weighed on South Africa’s trade balance and inflation outlook, as higher oil prices and rand weakness dampened sentiment. The index spent much of the month in negative territory before recovering. Resource and financial stocks bore the brunt of the selling, while energy-linked counters, notably Sasol, were an exception, benefitting from the surge in global oil prices.
A brief reprieve arrived mid-month when a temporary ceasefire between the US and Iran was announced, prompting a sharp relief rally in local equities. The index ultimately closed the month in positive territory, supported by this rebound and resilience in select industrial and energy counters, even as broader uncertainty continued to cap upside.
South African government bond yields fell at the start of the month, with the curve bull-flattening as longer-dated yields led the move lower. This reflected improved prospects for a ceasefire and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which pushed oil prices lower and eased inflation concerns. However, the move was largely reversed toward month-end as tensions resurfaced, reigniting inflationary pressures. The 10-year bond yield ended the month at 8.94%.
April saw the largest fuel price increases in South Africa’s history, driven by soaring global oil prices and a weaker rand. Petrol prices rose by over R3 per litre, net of a temporary general fuel levy reduction introduced by the National Treasury to cushion the impact, while diesel increased by more than R7 per litre. The month also saw Eskom’s new 8.76% electricity tariff hike take effect, creating a simultaneous energy cost shock for households and businesses. These twin pressures prompted widespread warnings of significant second-round inflation effects.
Inflation data published during April reflected conditions prior to the energy shock. South Africa’s annual inflation rate edged up to 3.1% in March, from 3.0% in February, with housing and utilities the largest contributor. Food inflation eased for a second consecutive month to 3.6%, with meat prices beginning to moderate after months of pressure linked to persistent foot-and-mouth disease supply constraints. Economists cautioned that the March print did not capture the full impact of April’s fuel and electricity increases, with materially higher inflation readings expected in the months ahead.
The rand remained under pressure throughout the month, finishing April at around R16.67 to the US dollar, reflecting the combined effects of global risk aversion and South Africa’s vulnerability as a net oil importer.
| Indices (total return in ZAR) | |
|---|---|
| FTSE JSE All Share Index | 1.6% |
| FTSE/JSE Financials Index | 2.6% |
| FTSE/JSE Industrials Index | 2.3% |
| FTSE/JSE Resources Index | -2.4% |
| FTSE/JSE ALBI | 3.3% |
| STEFI | 0.5% |
Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April 2026.
Markets steady, but lag the AI-led rally
Chinese equities rebounded modestly in April 2026 but continued to lag the broader emerging-market rally, which was driven by AI and semiconductor leaders in North Asia. The MSCI China All Shares Index rose by about 5.8% in US dollar terms, supported by stabilising macro signals and selective investor positioning. However, performance remained uneven beneath the surface. A clear divergence persisted between onshore and offshore markets.
Mainland A-shares were relatively resilient, underpinned by ample domestic liquidity and investor preference for policy-aligned sectors, such as advanced manufacturing, industrial upgrading and energy security. The Politburo’s latest communication reinforced a message of stability and structural reform rather than large-scale stimulus, anchoring expectations and supporting targeted opportunities rather than a broad-based re-rating. Economic data were mixed but not deteriorating, with manufacturing activity hovering around expansion territory, supported in part by exports and resilience in segments of the clean-tech complex, even as weak domestic demand and ongoing property sector stress continued to weigh on sentiment.
Offshore equities, by contrast, were more volatile. Hong Kong-listed technology and platform companies faced pressure from weaker earnings momentum and ongoing scrutiny around margins and monetisation, with profit growth for the Hang Seng Tech cohort at multi-year lows. In addition, reduced expectations for near-term monetary easing weighed on sentiment, as policymakers signalled less urgency for aggressive support. Property sector fragilities, including refinancing pressures among major developers, also kept risk premia elevated.
A war-resistant rally as semiconductors displace oil as the defining variable
Emerging market (EM) equities delivered a strong recovery in April, with the MSCI Emerging Markets Index rising nearly 15% in USD terms to reach an all-time high. The index has now gained 16% since the start of 2026, well ahead of the S&P 500, which returned approximately 5% over the same period. Almost two months into the war, the benchmark had practically recovered all the losses incurred since the US and Israel first struck Iran in late February - a striking contrast to 2022, when Russia's invasion of Ukraine sent oil and gas prices soaring and emerging markets into a tailspin. Much of the resilience stems from the index's changing composition. The oil shock from Iran has not affected all EM countries equally, while several of the key structural tailwinds supporting these markets remain firmly in place. With technology and semiconductor names now accounting for the majority of index weight, the AI hardware cycle - not oil - set the terms of debate for April's performance.
Regionally, we saw bifurcation within Asia. Northeast Asian markets, particularly South Korea and Taiwan, reached record highs. In contrast, South and Southeast Asian markets, with their heavy reliance on energy imports, struggled. South Korea's resurgence was driven by the long-term structural importance of semiconductors as a key input to economic activity, alongside the latest price-sensitive AI investment boom, which has reinforced the dominant position of leading-edge chip manufacturers. Taiwan was similarly buoyant, with markets rallying strongly, supported by robust earnings from index bellwether TSMC, which exceeded consensus estimates in the first quarter of 2026.
China recovered some ground in April, supported by easing US-China diplomatic tensions ahead of President Trump’s state visit to Beijing. However, structural headwinds in consumer confidence and property persisted, preventing China from catching up with the broader EM recovery. India remained a clear underperformer within EM, as its stock market pulled back sharply during the month, reflecting the acute energy import exposure of South and Southeast Asian economies.
In Latin America, net oil exporters broadly outperformed, although a late-month deterioration in Brazil's inflation data tempered earlier enthusiasm. Elsewhere, Central and Eastern European markets continued to lag the broader EM recovery in April, weighed down by elevated risk premia, tighter financial conditions, and proximity to energy transmission channels.
At the sector level, April underscored the structural shift in EM market leadership. Information technology and semiconductors drove the majority of the index-level gains. The energy sector also contributed positively to net oil-exporting EMs, as energy prices were projected to surge, amid attacks on energy infrastructure and shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.
Markets caught in the crosscurrents
European equities advanced in April, but the month was defined by sharp swings as investors weighed the economic impact of the Iran war and the associated energy shock. Brent crude remained more than 50% higher by mid-April than at the start of the year, while disruption around the Strait of Hormuz kept inflation and growth risks firmly in focus.
The STOXX Europe 600 recovered during the month after earlier weakness, supported by periods of relief around ceasefire and negotiation headlines. However, markets remained volatile, with energy-sensitive sectors and cyclicals swinging sharply in response to oil and gas prices. Financials and defensives were uneven, while growth and technology names benefitted from the broader rebound in risk appetite.
Inflation and policy remained central to the outlook. Eurozone inflation rose to 3.0% in April, driven by higher energy prices, while the European Central Bank held rates at 2% for a third consecutive meeting, balancing renewed inflationary pressure with a softer growth backdrop.
In the UK, equities also gained ground, although the market lagged other developed peers, as its heavier exposure to energy, financials and defensives proved less advantageous in a month that rewarded growth and technology stocks. Energy and bank shares were particularly volatile, tracking swings in oil prices, gilt yields and rate expectations against an unsettled geopolitical backdrop.
The UK’s inflation outlook also deteriorated. CPI rose to 3.3% in March, from 3.0% in February, with motor fuels making the largest upward contribution to the monthly change. The Bank of England kept interest rates unchanged at 3.75% at its April meeting, with one member voting for a hike, highlighting the uncertainty created by the Middle East conflict for global energy prices.
Central banks remain cautious as inflation concerns persist
US Treasury yields ended the month slightly higher across the curve, reflecting a combination of ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, inflation risks and a more hawkish Federal Reserve (Fed). Signs of strength in the US economy – a surprisingly robust rise in non-farm payrolls (March report) and a slight fall in the unemployment rate – contrasted with troubling inflation dynamics. The headline CPI rose 3.3% year-on-year in March, driven primarily by surging energy prices, while the Fed’s preferred measure (core PCE) rose to 3.2%, well above the Fed's 2% target. At its late-April meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee held rates at 3.50% to 3.75%, with three members refusing to support an easing bias in the statement given the growing risks to inflation. This dashed hopes of rate cuts in 2026. Markets now price no rate cuts this year.
Despite yields ending the month broadly unchanged, volatility continued in the European sovereign bond market, reflecting the energy price shock stemming from conflict in the Middle East. At one point, the 10-year German Bund yield rose to 3.1%, its highest level since 2011. While the ECB held its deposit rate at 2% for a seventh consecutive meeting, its messaging was less hawkish than expected, as policymakers stopped short of signalling that a June hike was guaranteed. Rising energy costs drove eurozone annual inflation to 3% in April, up from 2.6% in March, however core inflation edged lower to 2.2%. The eurozone economy expanded by just 0.1% in the first quarter. Against this backdrop, markets are pricing in around three rate hikes by year-end.
UK government bond yields rose further over April, notably in longer-dated gilts – the 10-year gilt yield climbed above 5%, and at one stage reached levels last seen in 2008. The driver was renewed inflation pressure from the Middle East conflict: CPI rose to 3.3% in March, up from 3.0% in February, led by higher fuel prices, while services inflation ticked up to 4.5%. The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee voted 8–1 to hold rates at 3.75%, with one member voting for a 25bps hike. Although the messaging was less hawkish than feared and caused yields to fall, market participants forecast two to three quarter-point rate hikes this year.
Japanese government bond yields rose over the month, with the 10-year yield reaching its highest level since 1997, driven by ongoing fiscal concerns and inflationary pressures. At its April meeting, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) kept its policy rate unchanged at 0.75% in a closely watched 6–3 vote, with the three dissenting members calling for an immediate hike to 1.0%. The split decision was interpreted by markets as a hawkish hold, with two rate hikes expected over 2026. The BoJ raised its core inflation forecast for fiscal year 2026 while cutting its growth outlook, citing the economic impact of the Middle East conflict and surging energy prices.
| Indices (total return in local currency) | |
|---|---|
| Bloomberg US Treasury Index | -0.1% |
| Bloomberg Global-Aggregate Total Return | 1.2% |
| Bloomberg EuroAgg Index | 0.5% |
Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April 2026.
A strong month for credit markets
A stronger appetite for risk drove a tightening of credit spreads in April, helping to deliver positive total returns across the board. The dispersion lay in the magnitude of gains rather than the direction.
Bank capital bonds (AT1s) and lower-rated collateralised loan obligations (CLOs) led performance. AT1 spreads tightened materially, resulting in strong total returns. In the CLO market, lower-rated tranches were the standout performers, with spreads in both Europe and the US tightening meaningfully.
After a difficult start to the year for the loan market, when heavy supply and pressure in the software sector weighed on performance, European and US loans rebounded sharply in April. Spreads tightened in both regions, particularly in Europe, and total returns turned positive for the year-to-date. The clear laggard was the US agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) market, where spreads were broadly unchanged and total returns were only marginally positive; as a long-duration, high-quality market, agency MBS was unable to keep pace with the spread-driven rally seen elsewhere.
Among more mainstream credit markets, high-yield debt outperformed investment-grade debt, reflecting the broader risk-on tone. European assets outperformed their US counterparts in both segments, as spreads tightened more in Europe following the March underperformance. The rebound in US high yield was notable given the recent selloff relating to US private credit market risk — a theme discussed in Picture this: in today's credit markets, the real risks lurk in the shadows.
Risk appetite rebounds, driving broad-based EM fixed income gains
While uncertainty in the Middle East continued and oil prices remained elevated, risk appetite recovered. This helped emerging market (EM) fixed income perform well over the month, returning year-to-date performance to positive territory. US dollar weakness provided a further boost to FX markets.
The local currency debt market (JPMorgan GBI-EM GD) gained 2.8% in US dollars over the month, with both FX and local rate moves contributing to performance. Hungarian debt topped the performance tables after a landslide victory by the opposition party increased the prospects of a closer relationship with the European Union and the release of previously frozen EU funds. Currencies in Latin America also performed well, helped by improved risk appetite, with the Brazilian real, Mexican peso and Chilean peso all among the top performers in the index.
The hard currency sovereign debt market (JPMorgan EMBI GD) also had a strong month, gaining 2.9%. This was led by the high-yield segment, which gained 4.1%, while investment-grade bonds lagged, delivering returns of 1.6%. As US Treasury yields rose slightly over the month, the positive return was entirely driven by credit spreads moves, especially among lower-rated issuers. By region, African markets were the top performers, followed by Latin America. Top-performing countries in the index included Ukraine, which was boosted by the election outcome in Hungary as the outgoing incumbent president had blocked Ukrainian financing. Angolan debt also performed well, as the oil-exporting economy is benefitting from higher commodity prices.
The EM corporate debt market (JPMorgan CEMBI BD) produced a return of 1.6%, led by the high-yield segment (2.4%), while the investment-grade market returned 1.1%. Like the hard currency sovereign market, performance was driven solely by credit spreads, which tightened over the month, particularly in the high-yield market. All sectors and regions delivered positive returns over April, with standout sectors including oil & gas and metals & mining, reflecting commodity price dynamics.
| Indices (total return in US Dollars) | |
|---|---|
| JPM GBI-EM | 2.8% |
| JPM EMBI | 2.9% |
| JPM CEMBI | 1.6% |
Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April 2026.
Conflict drives oil volatility
Oil was volatile in April, with the price of a barrel of Brent crude ranging from about US$90 to more than US$120 as hopes that the Strait of Hormuz would reopen to tanker traffic rose and faded. Over the full month, Brent declined by 4%, closing at US$114. Some analysts raised their long-term price forecasts during the month, reflecting not only the prospects of a prolonged conflict, but also the additional expected time it will take to repair infrastructure and rebuild stockpiles. As at the end of April, about 850 million barrels had been lost from supply since the start of hostilities.
Gold was little changed, ending April 1% lower at US$4,618 per Troy ounce. The shares of gold producers slightly underperformed gold (gold equities usually trend in the same direction as the precious metal, but with amplified moves), declining 3%. Total known holdings of gold by exchange-traded funds, often used as a proxy for desire to hold the precious metal, rose by 1% to 98.8 million ounces. The silver price declined 2%, while platinum gained 2%.
Industrial metals had a mixed month. The price of aluminium was little changed, but the commodity has moved sharply higher since the US-Iran conflict began. The initial impact of disruption to shipping has been compounded by reduced output at major smelters in the Middle East, which produces about one-tenth of global aluminium supply, and the market is now in significant deficit. Copper gained about 5%, with market tightness due to supply disruption outweighing worries that the inflationary impacts of the Middle East conflict could weaken economic activity and copper demand. Agricultural commodities also moved higher, with corn, wheat and soybeans all gaining, with the Middle East conflict driving up the price of farming inputs including fuel and fertilisers.
Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April 2026.
It has been another strong year for EM equities, which has left many investors pondering where exactly we are in this cycle. Archie Hart and Varun Laijawalla explain why there is scope to capture a re-rating that they believe has considerable upside from here.
The AI theme in credit markets is evolving rapidly. New financing packages can provide better compensation for risk but they require careful diligence.
The headwinds facing EM debt today are cyclical and manageable, with mispricing and divergence across countries creating a fertile hunting ground for active investors. Crucially, the strength of structural tailwinds behind the asset class is undiminished.
Our EM Debt team shares its latest outlook and positioning across the investment universe.
Overlapping pressures across agriculture, fertiliser and energy markets could create fresh inflationary risks this year, with wide ranging implications for commodity markets, monetary policy and emerging market assets.
Global markets split sharply in July, as a reassessment of AI valuations collided with a renewed oil shock. Doubts over AI capex and monetisation weighed heavily on technology and semiconductor stocks, while the collapse of the US-Iran agreement drove oil prices sharply higher, lifting energy, defence, and value-oriented markets. The result was one of the sharpest rotations in market leadership so far this year.
Ninety One's multi-asset growth team provides insights into the macroeconomic environment that informs our investment outlook for the coming quarter. This includes concise summaries of our asset class views.
For years, capital has gravitated to the US. A one-way trade powered by tech dominance and economic heft. But as the world tilts on its axis, the next cycle is unlikely to resemble the last, and the investment map is beginning to redraw itself.
A shrinking supply of shares has flattered US equity returns for years. The AI issuance boom is putting that into reverse.
Our credit experts review how credit markets fared in the second quarter of the year and share the latest scorecards for the global credit universe.
Recent election results point to a political pivot with positive implications for debt markets. Dynamics in this key region are reflective of broader shifts across the maturing EM debt market.
Our EM Debt team shares its latest outlook and positioning across the investment universe.
Markets are pricing in a rapid normalisation of Middle East oil supply following the US-Iran conflict. The talk at a resources industry conference highlights that risks remain.
As AI euphoria drives markets to historic concentration levels, the question every investor should be considering is: how much longer can the music play?
Risk assets had one of their strongest quarters in years, with easing geopolitical risks in the Middle East backed up by resilient earnings, and continued AI-capex-driven growth. Emerging markets, especially Korea and Taiwan, outperformed the US, while commodities came under pressure after the peace deal and expectations for rate hikes. Global credit markets also delivered a strong rebound over the quarter.
A just energy transition is about more than decarbonisation. Using South Africa as a live example, this paper explores why credible transition outcomes depend on the alignment of policy, infrastructure, capital and communities, and the role investors can play in supporting them.
As global investors reassess their allocations, emerging markets are entering the second half of the year from a position of genuine strength.
A low multiple is not necessarily a sign of value. Genuine value arises when there is a gap between the market value of a company and its true intrinsic worth.
Rising risks are increasingly evident in developed private credit markets. However, the dynamics look very different in less explored jurisdictions.
AI and the Iran conflict are pushing Europe and the US onto sharply different economic and monetary paths.

Market and portfolio insights, webinars & events curated from across our investment teams to help you steer through changing investment landscapes.
Important Information
This communication is provided for general information only should not be construed as advice.
All the information in is believed to be reliable but may be inaccurate or incomplete. The views are those of the contributor at the time of publication and do not necessary reflect those of Ninety One.
Any opinions stated are honestly held but are not guaranteed and should not be relied upon.
All rights reserved. Issued by Ninety One.