宏觀視野:央行會承擔風險「堅持」緊縮政策一段時間?(只供英文版)

回顧歷史,通脹事件並不常見。 因此,投資者和政策制定者很難將今天的經驗與歷史進行比較。

2023年12月12日

Alex Holroyd-Jones
Iain Cunningham

12 December 2023. Throughout history, inflationary episodes have been rare. It has therefore been difficult for investors and policymakers to draw parallels of today’s experience to history. The most often cited comparison is the experience of the 1970s and 1980s. Indeed, policymakers of the major central banks have often cited a determination to avoid the mistakes of this period, notably the Arthur Burns’ Fed, blamed with keeping policy too loose in the face of high inflation. Rather, they have invoked the spirit of Paul Volcker; the now legendary Federal Reserve Chair tasked by President Carter with slaying the inflation demons through his persistently restrictive monetary policies of the 1980s. Current Chair, Jerome Powell used both his 2022 and 2023 keynote speeches at the Jackson Hole Symposium, to reference the revered governor’s autobiography ‘keeping at it’, noting the central bank “must keep at it until the job is done”, cautioning “strongly against prematurely loosening policy”. This message continues to be presented today and is echoed across the major central banks. However, with monetary policy significantly tight across developed markets and clear signs that inflation is already falling rapidly, is there a risk that policymakers are ‘keeping at it’ for too long?

Significant progress has already been made by central banks in reaching their inflation goals. US headline inflation has fallen from a peak of 9.1% to close to 3%, whilst inflation in Europe has fallen from a peak of 10.6% to 2.4%. Initially driven by a fall in energy prices, the recent falls have been broader. Inflation of core goods prices, which encompasses items such as autos, household goods and appliances, has come off significantly, with weakness in demand, a reopening of supply chains and overstocking from business, all leading to goods price inflation collapsing to below the 2% inflation targets in both Europe and the US. We expect to see these prices to move into deflation in the coming months.

In contrast, for much of the last 12 months the service sector has been experiencing the strongest inflation, boosted by pent-up demand for those things we all missed during Covid; eating out, hotels and travel. As a result, the current run rate suggest that service prices are 5% higher than they were this time last year. However, a look under the surface of this headline show there are signs that significant progress is being made here too. Indeed, if currently monthly outcomes were to persist going forward, they would be consistent with service prices at the 2% target next year. If correct, this softening in service price inflation, alongside persistent weakness in good prices, could conceivably see inflation at or even below target by the end of 2024.

This all suggests that central bank’s restrictive policies are already having a broad disinflationary effect on the economy, particularly through weakening demand driven by significantly higher borrowing costs. At the same time, the forcefulness of their actions has kept inflation expectations well anchored, a big difference to the experience of the 1970 and 80s. It is also important to remember that there are lags from their policy actions, and much of the policy tightening implemented this year has yet to be felt across all sectors of the economy. If demand were to weaken more substantially, and specifically if this led to a broader deterioration in labour markets, then the inflation outcome could be even weaker than that expressed here. Indeed, it is possible we could even face a period of deflation. Despite this clear risk, central banks remain reticent to declare victory, call the all clear and take a forward-looking approach, as they remain much chastised by their assessment that inflation was ‘transitory’ in 2021.

In this context, the economic history of WWII and its aftermath may prove useful as it shares several similarities with the war on Covid. In both cases, there was a massive fiscal expansion and large-scale quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve. With supply chains disrupted and demand bottled up, inflation rose from 2% to 20% in 1946-47 and was quickly met with contractionary monetary and fiscal policy for a prolonged period. This weakened demand and as supply chains normalised again, this led to a rapid fall in inflation. With policy kept tight despite this, prices were driven even lower, and ended in deflation in 1949. It is entirely possible, that markets find themselves facing a similar deflationary shock in 2024.

With policymakers focusing on realised inflation outcomes, and purposely playing it safe by failing to account for lagged impact of their policy tightening on future inflation, there is a clear risk that unlike making the mistake of the 1970s, they risk making the mistakes of the 1940s and risk ‘keeping at it’ for too long.

Alex Holroyd-Jones
投资组合经理
Alex is a portfolio manager in the Multi-Asset team at Ni......
Iain Cunningham
投資組合經理
Iain是晉達資產管理多元資產團隊的投資組合經理。他是環球多元資產總回報、環球策略管理和多元資產防護策略的聯席投資......

重要資訊

本文的資訊可能會討論一般的市場活動或行業趨勢,不擬作為預測、研究或投資建議的憑據。本文提供的經濟及市場觀點反映晉達資產管理截至所示日期的判斷,可能會隨時更改,恕不另行通知。概不保證所表達的觀點及意見正確無誤,可能未能反映整個晉達資產管理的觀點,按不同的投資目標可能會表達不同的觀點。儘管我們認為來自外部的任何資訊均為可靠的,但我們並未對其作出獨立審核,因此我們不能保證其準確性或完整性。晉達資產管理的內部數據可能未經審核。晉達資產管理未有提供法律或稅務建議。準投資者在作出與稅收相關的投資決定之前,應諮詢其稅務顧問。

本通訊僅視為一般資訊,並非投資邀請,亦不構成提呈出售。投資涉及風險。此並非對任何特定證券作出買入、沽售或持有之建議。概無聲明任何投資將會或可能取得類似過往的利潤或虧損,或將會避免出現重大損失。本文中提及的證券或投資產品可能未有在任何司法管轄區註冊。

於香港,本通訊由晉達資產管理香港有限公司發行,並未經證券及期貨事務監察委員會(證監會)審核。

除非另有授權,否則未經晉達資產管理事先書面同意,不得將本文件資料顯示、複製、傳送或以其他方式提供給任何第三方。©2024年晉達資產管理。版權所有。

所列示的過往表現數據並不反映未來表現。投資者應注意,投資帶有風險。投資者應參閱銷售文件以了解詳情,包括風險因素。本網站未經香港證監會審查。

一經點擊以下投資者關係的連結,閣下將離開專為香港零售投資者提供資料的本網站,進入全球網站。

務請注意,全球網站並非以香港投資者為對象。該網站未經香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(「證監會」)審閱。該網站可能包含未經證監會認可的基金及其他投資產品的資料,因此不得向香港零售投資者銷售。該網站亦可能包含據稱由晉達集團旗下的香港境外公司提供或採取的投資服務/策略的資料。

本網站所載的任何產品文件及資料僅供參考,並供位於有關資料及其使用並無違反當地法律或規例的司法管轄區或國家的人士或實體使用。

發行人:晉達資產管理香港有限公司
電郵:[email protected] 
電話:(852) 2861 6888
傳真:(852) 2861 6861