宏觀視野:分析經濟放緩(只供英文版)

宏觀研究主管Sahil Mahtani討論在市場大幅調整下,增長恐慌為何不影響對仍可能實現軟著陸的看法。

2024年8月15日

4分鐘

Sahil Mahtani

In the end, some of 2024’s winning trades were unwound fairly quickly. Japanese equities and the Nasdaq erased nearly all their six-month gains within days. The so-called ‘Magnificent 7’, while still buoyed by Nvidia’s year-to-date gains, fell nearly 25% from their peak, underperforming the S&P by 15 percentage points and highlighting the risks of concentrated markets1. In bonds and currencies, the yen retraced to its January levels against the dollar, while 10-year Treasury yields tumbled to their December lows.

What has driven the price action and how seriously should investors take it? Three drivers stand out.

First, investors have reappraised the growth trajectory of the US economy. Labour markets have been slowing all year, and weak ISM data and the low number of jobs added in the non-farm payrolls revived recession fears. Wage growth has also slowed to an annualised rate of 3.6%, finally triggering Claudia Sahm’s recession indicator. Meanwhile, the earnings season brought a spate of weak results from consumer companies like McDonalds and Pepsi. Companies benefitting from higher-income spending, like Pool Corp, which builds swimming pools, or AbbVie, which makes Botox, also highlighted weak consumer demand in the US.

Combined with the growth scare, investors are also worried the Fed has moved too slowly on launching its cutting cycle and will need to catch up. At the end of H1, Fed Funds Futures were expecting two 25 basis point cuts at most by the end of the year. Markets now expect four.

The second factor driving the price action is an almighty positioning unwind in a number of interlocking financial assets. The AI trade had been undergoing reappraisal since mid-July, as analysts grew more sceptical about its value-generating ability. This scepticism was quickly vindicated by the hyperscalers’ Q2 earnings, which revealed a 50% increase in capital expenditures against a debatable demand backdrop. Moreover, possible US restrictions on selling AI memory chips to China threw a further spanner in the demand picture, which was not helped by Intel’s weak outlook and planned downsizing in its second quarter earnings.

In addition, the BOJ’s decision to raise rates in response to persistent domestic inflation lowered real interest rate differentials between US and Japanese sovereign bonds, putting upward pressure on the yen. When combined with an existing carry trade funded in Japanese yen, this caused a major positioning unwind across global markets. For instance, price action since mid-July has unwound nine months of gains in the MXNJPY cross, while a liquidation of domestic Japanese assets by foreign investors has not been matched by domestic buying. Carry trades are inherently short volatility, and their unwind contributed to the VIX spike. All this has been exacerbated by thin liquidity during the summer months.

Furthermore, changes in the market structure have contributed to the sudden jump in volatility. The growth of passive investing and systematic trading strategies has depleted the capital available to active discretionary investors to fight momentum with contrarian views, increasing the latent potential for volatility. The self-reinforcing nature of different systematic strategies has amplified the low volatility bias in markets and contributed to their unwind. For example, volatility-targeting funds enable higher leverage and dip-buying during quiet market regimes, but also require liquidations of those levered strategies during periods of higher volatility.

Changes on the market-making side are as important as those on the investor side. With risk capital shifting from banks to multi-strategy firms, market-making capital is becoming more concentrated in a small number of funds, albeit funds with historically strong risk management practices. Still, it is a truism of finance that concentration exacerbates volatility.

Despite the growth scare, we believe the US economy is not as weak as current fears imply – the data is mixed rather than dire. For instance, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker for the third quarter is currently at 2.5%, and high frequency consumption data (e.g. card spending, restaurant bookings, airline passengers) are not showing signs of slowdown.

The private sector financial imbalances also remain low, particularly in the household sector, where debt service ratios are in the bottom quartile of outcomes since 1980.

Finally, there appears to be significant pent-up demand for some rate-sensitive products, particularly in the property market, which has been restrained by high mortgage rates. This is likely the result of a demographic mini-cycle, where millennial homebuyers are leveraging to form households. If rates ease in response to a growth scare, we believe this will likely lead to a surge in realised demand.

Beyond demographics, other structural tailwinds, such as a capex supercycle, are on the horizon. While extreme market ructions can sometimes impact the real economy, investors have reason to view the decline with scepticism…

作者

Sahil Mahtani
策略師, Investment Institute 投資智庫

重要資訊

本文的資訊可能會討論一般的市場活動或行業趨勢,不擬作為預測、研究或投資建議的憑據。本文提供的經濟及市場觀點反映晉達資產管理截至所示日期的判斷,可能會隨時更改,恕不另行通知。概不保證所表達的觀點及意見正確無誤,可能未能反映整個晉達資產管理的觀點,按不同的投資目標可能會表達不同的觀點。儘管我們認為來自外部的任何資訊均為可靠的,但我們並未對其作出獨立審核,因此我們不能保證其準確性或完整性。晉達資產管理的內部數據可能未經審核。晉達資產管理未有提供法律或稅務建議。準投資者在作出與稅收相關的投資決定之前,應諮詢其稅務顧問。

本通訊僅視為一般資訊,並非投資邀請,亦不構成提呈出售。投資涉及風險。此並非對任何特定證券作出買入、沽售或持有之建議。概無聲明任何投資將會或可能取得類似過往的利潤或虧損,或將會避免出現重大損失。本文中提及的證券或投資產品可能未有在任何司法管轄區註冊。

於香港,本通訊由晉達資產管理香港有限公司發行,並未經證券及期貨事務監察委員會(證監會)審核。

除非另有授權,否則未經晉達資產管理事先書面同意,不得將本文件資料顯示、複製、傳送或以其他方式提供給任何第三方。©2024年晉達資產管理。版權所有。

所列示的過往表現數據並不反映未來表現。投資者應注意,投資帶有風險。投資者應參閱銷售文件以了解詳情,包括風險因素。本網站未經香港證監會審查。

一經點擊以下投資者關係的連結,閣下將離開專為香港零售投資者提供資料的本網站,進入全球網站。

務請注意,全球網站並非以香港投資者為對象。該網站未經香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(「證監會」)審閱。該網站可能包含未經證監會認可的基金及其他投資產品的資料,因此不得向香港零售投資者銷售。該網站亦可能包含據稱由晉達集團旗下的香港境外公司提供或採取的投資服務/策略的資料。

本網站所載的任何產品文件及資料僅供參考,並供位於有關資料及其使用並無違反當地法律或規例的司法管轄區或國家的人士或實體使用。

發行人:晉達資產管理香港有限公司
電郵:[email protected] 
電話:(852) 2861 6888
傳真:(852) 2861 6861