The EM Alternative Credit team offers a range of strategies that invest across the developing world, from Africa to Latin America. All investments focus on corporate credit and infrastructure debt as we believe these offer the best risk-reward profile.
Since 2008, the team has built a wide origination platform. It is highly selective in both the investments it makes and the deal terms it stipulates. On-the-ground expertise in these complex jurisdictions means we can take controlled risk to target attractive returns.
Scale, performance and investment skills
|
Diversification and risk control
|
Customisation and sustainability
|
Source: Ninety One as at March 2026.
Led by Alper Kilic, the team comprises investment specialists in Cape Town, London, New York, and Singapore, supported by dedicated legal, ESG and impact professionals.
1 All vintages of South Africa and Africa Credit Opportunities since inception in 2008 and the Emerging Africa and Asia Infrastructure Fund since 2002. Ninety One has managed EAAIF since 2016. The capital deployed amount includes reinvested capital.
2 Across open and closed USD private credit strategies since May 2008, and Emerging Africa and Asia Infrastructure Fund since May 2016. Gross of fees. The IRR range shown reflects historical net IRRs achieved by different funds within the platform. These funds have materially different investment objectives, strategies, risk profiles, fee structures and inception dates. The range does not represent a composite, average or expected return for the platform, and individual fund outcomes have varied significantly
General risks. All investments carry the risk of capital loss. The value of investments, and any income generated from them, can fall as well as rise and will be affected by changes in interest rates, currency fluctuations, general market conditions and other political, social and economic developments, as well as by specific matters relating to the assets in which the investment strategy invests. If any currency differs from the investor’s home currency, returns may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Environmental, social or governance related risk events or factors, if they occur, could cause a negative impact on the value of investments.
Specific risks. Derivatives: The use of derivatives may increase overall risk by magnifying the effect of both gains and losses leading to large changes in value and potentially large financial loss. A counterparty to a derivative transaction may fail to meet its obligations which may also lead to a financial loss. Emerging markets: These markets carry a higher risk of financial loss than more developed markets as they may have less developed legal, political, economic or other systems. Credit Risk: Where the value of an investment depends on a party (which could be a company, government or other institution) fulfilling an obligation to pay, there exists a risk that the obligation will not be satisfied. This risk is greater the weaker the financial strength of the party. The Net Asset Value the portfolio could be affected by any actual or feared breach of the party’s obligations, while the income of the portfolio would be affected only by an actual failure to pay, which is known as a default. Default: There is a risk that the issuers of fixed income investments (e.g. bonds) may not be able to meet interest payments nor repay the money they have borrowed. The worse the credit quality of the issuer, the greater the risk of default and therefore investment loss. Liquidity: There may be insufficient buyers or sellers of particular investments giving rise to delays in trading and being able to make settlements, and/or large fluctuations in value. This may lead to larger financial losses than might be anticipated. Sustainable Strategies: Sustainable, impact or other sustainability-focused portfolios consider specific factors related to their strategies in assessing and selecting investments. As a result, they will exclude certain industries and companies that do not meet their criteria. This may result in their portfolios being substantially different from broader benchmarks or investment universes, which could in turn result in relative investment performance deviating significantly from the performance of the broader market.