If things are so bad, why has fixed income held up so well?

Why higher real interest rates and the positive income environment will likely persist.

Feb 12, 2020

6 minutes

Why higher real interest rates and the positive income environment will likely persist.

At a glance:

  • High real interest rates and attractive bond market valuations have supported SA fixed income assets.
  • The overspend by the government needs to be financed largely from offshore sources.
  • South Africa therefore needs enticing real interest rates to attract foreign investors into our bond market.
  • This dynamic is unlikely to change soon; therefore, we expect higher real interest rates and the positive income environment to persist.
  • While we are positioned to take advantage of appealing real bond yields, our offshore exposure acts as a buffer against the obvious risks.   

Bad news on the domestic front continues to trouble investors: load shedding, woeful economic growth, a further deterioration in government finances, policy inertia and the threat of a Moody’s downgrade – to name a few. It’s not surprising that the most common question we get from clients is: Why are the SA bond market and the rand holding up so well? The rand strengthened against the dollar while the bond market returned a solid 10% last year.  We think the answer lies in defence. Much like the Springboks showed impressive defensive characteristics in winning the 2019 World Cup, so too do the rand and the SA bond market have two key defensive advantages, which help explain their expectation-beating performance in 2019.

Defence number one: high real interest rates  

The SA government is spending more than it earns, running a budget deficit of more than 6% of GDP. In monetary terms, this overspend translates into nearly R300bn annually. As a result, government debt to GDP has hit 60% – and is climbing even higher. Interest payments are now close to two-thirds of the government’s budget deficit. Given the magnitude of these numbers, the government relies heavily on foreign bond investors to help fund the overspend. Foreign ownership of SA government bonds amounts to 37%.1 

We are seeing the effect of this foreign ownership on our current account.  South Africa is running a current account deficit of 3-4% of GDP, which means that from an income perspective, more money flows out of our country than into it.  Over the last five years, the interest paid to foreign debt holders has grown substantially. These foreign income payments are one of the biggest contributors to our current account deficit.

The two deficits are related, meaning the overspend by the government needs to be financed from offshore sources. South Africa therefore needs enticing real interest rates to attract foreign investors into our government bond market. To maintain this fragile equilibrium, the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) has little choice but to keep real interest rates higher than it otherwise would have done.

Figure 1: SA has to offer foreign investors enticing rates to keep the rand stable

 SA has to offer foreign investors enticing rates to keep the rand stable graph 

Source: Ninety One SA (Pty) Ltd and Bloomberg, as at December 2019, and 2020 forecast, as at January 2020.

Figure 1 shows how maintaining this delicate balance has kept inflation under control and the rand relatively stable, despite the marked fiscal deterioration. Inflation has realised close to 4.5% over the last few years and cash rates have been 2-3% above that. Such real rates are very attractive in relation to what you can get globally. As a result, foreign investors have been enticed to allocate capital to the SA bond market, keeping the rand and yields relatively steady.

Defence number two: SA bond market valuations

Global recession fears over the past two years have seen yields in developed markets (DMs) decline. With bond yields low to negative in DMs, investors are increasingly seeking higher yield opportunities in emerging markets (EMs). But how does the SA bond market stack up against EM peers?

Figure 2: The bond market’s defence – a lot of bad news is priced in
SA 9-year bond yield vs. EM spread

The bond market’s defence – a lot of bad news is priced in graph 

Source: Bloomberg, as at 10.01.2020.

As can be seen from Figure 2, which shows what SA government bonds yield over their EM peers, pre-2015 SA had a yield spread of approximately 1-1.5%. This has widened to a premium of over 3.5% above EM peers – a level that is even higher than when we were heading into the ANC Elective Conference at the end of 2017 (bond prices fall when yields rise – so this amounts to a significant price discount). Many would argue (as we do) that SA is in a far better place politically than it was in 2017, so we believe these higher relative yields mean a credit rating downgrade is largely priced in.

Moody’s next rating review is scheduled for March this year, after February’s budget. We would need to see a significant attempt to consolidate SA’s debt trajectory for Moody’s not to downgrade, and that consolidation would likely have to come from the government wage bill. Given that the quantum of savings required is a minimum of R150bn over three years, and considering how politically sensitive such a move would be, we think a resounding fiscal response (whilst not impossible) is unlikely.

Outlook and portfolio positioning

We do not expect the government’s fiscal predicament to be resolved any time soon, and therefore, these higher real interest rates and the positive income environment will likely persist. 

With inflation firmly under control around the SARB’s mid-point target range and demand so weak, there is room for another rate cut or two this year.   However, with the obvious fiscal risks and the need to offer enticing real interest rates, the scope for material cuts (in excess of 1%) is limited. We would need to see the fiscal risk premium reduce before such a prospect becomes feasible.  Uncertainty over Eskom and precarious government finances are constraining economic growth.  Further governance and economic reforms are crucial to restore confidence and jumpstart the economy. 

The rand and SA bonds have also held up because the global environment has become more supportive.  The US Federal Reserve started cutting rates last year and has also employed other monetary stimulus measures, which have bolstered risk assets. The US-China ‘phase one’ trade deal has lifted markets too. Our bond market and the rand have also benefited from these initiatives. Because of our dependence on foreign investors, we would argue that the global environment is as important as the local environment for SA fixed income assets.

But we would be naïve not to recognise that risks and uncertainties abound – both on the local and global front. It remains to be seen whether Eskom can arrest its decline and if February’s budget will offer concrete measures to address government debt and allay Moody’s concerns. We expect global growth to continue to stabilise this year, but recession fears are never far away. 

From a Diversified Income portfolio perspective, how do we deal with what is a fantastic inflation-beating income environment amid the obvious local and global risks?  We believe SA fixed income still offers very attractive valuation opportunities, and we have a balance of exposures to provide some protection.  Whilst we are positioned to take advantage of appealing real bond yields, our offshore exposure acts as a buffer, should any of these risks arise.  This investment strategy has worked well for us during periods where we have experienced bond market volatility or rand weakness.

Authored by

Peter Kent

Co-Head of SA & Africa Fixed Income

Malcolm Charles

Portfolio Manager, Fixed Income

Important information 

This communication was originally published by Investec Asset Management (Pty) Ltd, the predecessor of Ninety One SA (Pty) Ltd. The information is accurate as at the original date of publication, but any views expressed may no longer be current. The communication has been republished in our new branding but has not otherwise been updated.

All information provided is product related and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. We are not acting and do not purport to act in any way as an advisor or in a fiduciary capacity. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of a particular situation. This is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any particular security. Collective investment scheme funds are generally medium to long term investments and the manager, Investec Fund Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd, gives no guarantee with respect to the capital or the return of the fund. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The value of participatory interests (units) may go down as well as up. Funds are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The fund may borrow up to 10% of its market value to bridge insufficient liquidity. A schedule of charges, fees and advisor fees is available on request from the manager which is registered under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act. Additional advisor fees may be paid and if so, are subject to the relevant FAIS disclosure requirements. Performance shown is that of the fund and individual investor performance may differ as a result of initial fees, actual investment date, date of any subsequent reinvestment and any dividend withholding tax. There are different fee classes of units on the fund and the information presented is for the most expensive class. Fluctuations or movements in exchange rates may cause the value of underlying international investments to go up or down. Where the fund invests in the units of foreign collective investment schemes, these may levy additional charges which are included in the relevant Total Expense Ratio (TER). A higher TER does not necessarily imply a poor return, nor does a low TER imply a good return. The ratio does not include transaction costs. The TER of the Diversified Income Fund (A) class is 1.01%. The current TER cannot be regarded as an indication of the future TERs. Additional information on the funds may be obtained, free of charge, at www.ninetyone.com. The Manager, PO Box 1655, Cape Town, 8000, Tel: 0860 500 100. The scheme trustee is FirstRand Bank Limited, PO Box 7713, Johannesburg, 2000, Tel: (011) 282 1808. Ninety One SA (Pty) Ltd (“Ninety One”) is an authorised financial services provider and a member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA (ASISA).

This document is the copyright of Ninety One and its contents may not be re-used without Ninety One’s prior permission. Ninety One SA (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider. Issued, February 2020.