Investment platform

The DFM landscape

The use of discretionary fund managers has proliferated in the advisor community, but what are the caveats?

Apr 7, 2021

4 minutes

Daryll Welsh
The use of discretionary fund managers has proliferated in the advisor community, but what are the caveats?

In our February 2021 “What are advisors thinking?” piece, we touched on advisor trends relating to investment strategy. One noteworthy investment trend identified is with respect to the relationship between advisors and discretionary fund managers (DFMs). Below, in our first of two articles on DFMs, we summarise some of the key take-aways from the survey as they relate to the DFM landscape.

1. Usage of DFMs by advisor segment

With the exception of general practitioners (“GPs”) all advisor segments have seen an increase in the usage of DFMs, either through the use of an independent DFM or by practices themselves acquiring a Category 2 license and incorporating DFM services into their business.

Understandably the GP segment saw the lowest penetration and growth as DFMs have typically targeted the larger investment-focused advisor practices to ramp up the asset base in the shortest possible time.

Figure 1: Usage of DFMs per segment

Usage of DFMs per segment

Overall, 72% of those surveyed reporting using a DFM in some shape or form, clear evidence that advisors perceive value in having discretion over client assets.

2. Reason for DFM usage

As an advisor’s business grows, the complexities associated with running a larger business with more clients and more product options also increases. This could also explain why DFM usage is more prevalent in the investment specialist segment, since the requirement to seek out operational efficiencies in this segment is more pressing. This together with investment governance (on the back of increased regulatory oversight) account for more than 50% of the motivation to use a DFM.

Figure 2: Reason for DFM usage

Reason for DFM usage

Perhaps more interesting is that while DFMs themselves often claim improved cost to client as a reason for their usage, only 13% of advisors believe this to be a driving factor in choosing a DFM. Unsurprisingly then, the main reason for not choosing to use a DFM is the perception that they are too expensive. Even more concerning is that for those advisors who expressed a concern with the use of DFM, 68% of the concern related to uncertain value for money.

Reason for not using DFM and Among those using DFMs, main concern relating to their use

3. Potential for growth in DFM assets

All advisor segments expect to increase their usage of DFM solutions. There are 2 ways in which this could happen. Firstly, by more advisors choosing to use DFMs (in the GP segment). We think that technology will need to be employed to unlock this opportunity since DFMs lack the reach and capacity to effectively target and service this segment of the market. Most likely this could be achieved using generic models.

Figure 5: Percentage expecting increase in DFM usage

Percentage expecting increase in DFM usage

Secondly, by increasing client take-up of existing DFM solutions (in the Investment Specialist and Holistic sectors). While DFMs are used in these segments, the actual take-up of DFM solutions is typically only about 50% of some advisors’ books. Reasons cited for the slow take-up are potential CGT implications, client pushback and advisor inertia. The key to converting the remaining clients lies in building a compelling argument (performance comparisons) around the benefits of moving to the proposed solution.

Figure 6: Proportion of client base using DFM

Proportion of client base using DFM

4. Evolution of DFM investment structures

While investment propositions vary greatly by DFM, they generally tend to follow a similar lifecycle. Most start out with model portfolios using a combination of multi-asset funds since this is the path of least resistance to getting an advisor over the line. Over time, these migrate to using a combination of multi-asset and building block funds as the DFM looks to prove value-add through manager selection and taking more control of the asset allocation process. This often leads to the inclusion of passives to reduce costs thereby offsetting the additional cost of the DFM. Ultimately (and providing enough scale has been built) the DFM may launch their own CIS vehicles to gain additional control over the investment proposition.

We’ll delve further into this important aspect in a future article and have a close look at how assets on the Ninety One platform are being managed by DFMs and how these compare to advisor-managed investment propositions.

Take-aways for Ninety One

While a lot what the NMG survey revealed about DFMs may seem obvious to many advisors, there are some take-aways that will play a significant role in our business planning. DFMs have an important role to play in the advisor/platform landscape and ultimately we should all be aligned, so as to deliver better investment outcomes for clients. Like any industry, not all players are equal and it is encouraging to see from the survey that advisors are placing a high emphasis on measuring the value-add that a DFM brings to the party. Platforms also have a role to play here, through enhanced reporting and functionality that will allow the advisor to measure the performance of the DFM and apply the same scrutiny as they have become accustomed to when measuring funds.

Download the PDF

Authored by

Daryll Welsh
Head of Product - Ninety One Investment Platform

Important information
All information and opinions provided are of a general nature and are not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. We are not acting and do not purport to act in any way as an advisor or in a fiduciary capacity. No one should act upon such information or opinion without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of a particular situation. This is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any particular security

Collective investment scheme funds are generally medium to long term investments and the manager, Ninety One Fund Managers SA (RF) (Pty) Ltd, gives no guarantee with respect to the capital or the return of the fund. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The value of participatory interests (units) may go down as well as up. Funds are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The fund may borrow up to 10% of its market value to bridge insufficient liquidity. A schedule of charges, fees and advisor fees is available on request from the manager which is registered under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act. Additional advisor fees may be paid and if so, are subject to the relevant FAIS disclosure requirements. Performance shown is that of the fund and individual investor performance may differ as a result of initial fees, actual investment date, date of any subsequent reinvestment and any dividend withholding tax. There are different fee classes of units on the fund and the information presented is for the most expensive class. Fluctuations or movements in exchange rates may cause the value of underlying international investments to go up or down. Where the fund invests in the units of foreign collective investment schemes, these may levy additional charges which are included in the relevant TER. Additional information on the funds may be obtained, free of charge, at www.NinetyOne.com. Ninety One SA (Pty) Ltd (“Ninety One SA”) is an authorised financial services provider and a member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA (ASISA).

Investment Team: There is no assurance that the persons referenced herein will continue to be involved with investing for this Fund, or that other persons not identified herein will become involved with investing assets for the Manager or assets of the Fund at any time without notice.

Investment Process: Any description or information regarding investment process or strategies is provided for illustrative purposes only, may not be fully indicative of any present or future investments and may be changed at the discretion of the manager without notice. References to specific investments, strategies or investment vehicles are for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase or sell such investments or to engage in any particular strategy. Portfolio data is expected to change and there is no assurance that the actual portfolio will remain as described herein. There is no assurance that the investments presented will be available in the future at the levels presented, with the same characteristics or be available at all. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and has no bearing upon the ability of Manager to construct the illustrative portfolio and implement its investment strategy or investment objective.

In the event that specific funds are mentioned please refer to the relevant minimum disclosure document in order to obtain all the necessary information in regard to that fund.

This presentation is the copyright of Ninety One SA and its contents may not be re-used without Ninety One’s prior permission.