Hidden GEMs: Beware outdated perceptions when comparing credit markets

Now more than ever, it is worth revisiting old perceptions and taking a fresh look at the world of emerging market credit. Alan Siow, Co-Head of Emerging Market Corporate Debt, explains why an updated perspective is needed and highlights the opportunity costs of sticking with old labels when searching for yield and growth opportunities in credit markets.

21 Aug 2024

4 minutes

Alan Siow

The new regime

The shift to a new macroeconomic regime is among factors that have redrawn the fixed income investment landscape in the past few years. Major economies like the US are only just getting to grips with inflation – with rates set to remain higher for longer than many had hoped. They also face the daunting prospect of returning fiscal deficits to a post-pandemic sustainable path.

Add to that a proliferation of election-related uncertainty and increasing divergence across global economies, and old labels used by asset allocators no longer seem useful or fitting. This is particularly the case for ‘emerging markets,’ a label synonymous with higher volatility, lower perceived credit quality, and greater political uncertainty.

In recent years, there has been a ‘blurring of lines’ between developed and emerging market (EM) debt. Developments, such as proactive rate cutting that have underpinned a strengthening of EM fundamentals, have fed through into resilient sovereign debt market performance. Meanwhile, shifts in the developed market universe have resulted in a much more volatile fixed income market regime. In the last year, elections in emerging markets including India, South Africa and Mexico have evidenced peaceful democracy in action, with predominantly market-friendly outcomes. The greatest political uncertainty facing investors arguable stems from the looming US election.

Turning to the macroeconomy, while inflation finally seems to be trending down in the US, many EM central banks are further ahead in their rate-cutting cycles. This, together with fundamentals that are generally on a positive trajectory, puts EM economies at an advantage.

Firmer foundations for EM corporate credit issuers

The fundamental improvements seen in EM economies naturally provide firmer foundations for the companies operating in them – and for the debt they issue. But that’s only part of the story.

The world order is undergoing a significant shift. The unipolar dominance of the past, characterised by the United States as the sole superpower, is transitioning to a multipolar world marked by various centres of economic, political, and military influence. Power shifts, by their nature, create both volatility and opportunity.

Countries that diversify their economies, build strong regional alliances, and can navigate between different global powers are likely to benefit. Winners will also include those countries and markets that are geographically well-positioned to benefit from trends like friendshoring.

Market-leading global companies with prudent management

It is an often-overlooked fact that emerging markets are home to many market-leading companies, with a global footprint and geographically diverse revenue sources. Familiar brand names owned by EM companies include Samsung, Volvo, GE Appliances and Jaguar Land Rover.

It’s also a well-kept secret that EM companies typically have very low leverage. These companies are familiar with volatility and have historically experienced periods when they struggled to finance themselves with longer-term debt. Thus, their short-term debt is higher as a percentage than it is in DM companies, and their refinancing risks have historically been higher, which has led to a culture of retaining cash while containing leverage. This has been particularly evident since the COVID crisis, as many companies have pared back their expansion and capital expenditure, leaving them with healthy cash balances and strong buffers. The contrast with many developed market companies is stark.

A look behind the labels

We believe that the case for including EM credit alongside DM allocations in portfolios is strong. But pre-existing perceptions can be hard to shift. To help inform an up-to-date view, we share some key metrics below of the large, diverse and maturing asset class of EM credit.

EM corporate credit offers comparable or superior yields, for similar credit quality and duration

EM corporate credit offers comparable or superior yields, for similar credit quality and duration

Source: JP Morgan, BofA, 30 June 2024. EM data is from JP Morgan CEMBI IG/HY indices, while US IG/HY data is from BofA indices.

Not only is the EM asset class a globally diverse universe that spans continents, in many ways, EM and DM/US credit markets are alike. In some respects, EM credits have more favourable characteristics. A look at the key characteristics of the asset class today and how it stacks up suggests it can play a useful role in a broader credit/growth fixed income allocation.

Authored by

Alan Siow

Jeannie Dumas

Communications Director (ex-Africa)

Laura Henderson

Communications Manager

Important Information

This communication is provided for general information only should not be construed as advice.

All the information in is believed to be reliable but may be inaccurate or incomplete. The views are those of the contributor at the time of publication and do not necessary reflect those of Ninety One.

Any opinions stated are honestly held but are not guaranteed and should not be relied upon.

All rights reserved. Issued by Ninety One.

For further information on indices, fund ratings, yields, targeted or projected performance returns, back-tested results, model return results, hypothetical performance returns, the investment team, our investment process, and specific portfolio names, please click here.